Content. The marketing strategy catchall. No matter the
problem – declining sales, poor branding, lack of distribution and reach –
content can solve it. Is this just wishful thinking?
How to Write About Advertising
If you want to write an article about advertising and have it blow up overnight – the comments section rife with
equal parts cynicism and dismissal – there are two ways to do it.
Being Consistent
In many cultures, consistency is viewed as a desirable
personality trait. People who behave predictably and routinely are seen as
stable and dependable, whereas people who are inconsistent are generally seen
as having little focus and direction.
Psychologists have known this since the 60s because it
applies to many routine behaviours, but the principle of consistency is,
ironically, consistently misapplied in advertising.
Labels:
branding,
psychology,
theories
Social Cognition: Part 3
Every day, you are persuaded by those around you. Whether it is to make a quick decision, buy a product, or
read an article with an evocative headline like this…
…We are likely to be open to suggestion during critical
moments of non-thinking; what Kahneman famously refers to as System 1 processing. This is when our emotions take
precedence over rational strategies while making decisions.
Labels:
psychology,
sociology,
theories
Social Cognition: Part 2
To most people, being part of a large group grants a sense
of autonomy, relatedness, and power. When we are tied to something greater than
our individual selves – be it a social cause, ideology, or cultural attribute –
it can help shape our identity.
But being a member of a large group significantly changes
the way we behave. We may gain some identity through shared group attributes,
but those attributes make us feel less responsible for individual actions.
Labels:
psychology,
sociology,
theories
Social Cognition: Part 1
“People don’t just receive external
information; they also process it and become architects of their own social
environment” – Markus
and Zajonc (1985)
Imagine
yourself in a new environment full of people you’ve never met. For most, this
is a stressful situation. Interacting with people without knowing how they see
and interpret the world carries a fair degree of uncertainty, and therefore,
vigilance.
Micro-Moments
There’s been a lot of discussion recently around
micro-moments, one of the latest marketing tactics from Google, as an attempt
to facilitate shared experiences between brand and user.
In short, micro-moments seek to capture consumer demand at
its most powerful; in those small, every-day moments when people seek answers
to the questions they are most frequently asking.
Self-Confessed Experts
There is an idiom that sometimes pops up on social forums
about ‘incompetent people being too incompetent to recognise their own
incompetence’.
While often used as a catch-22 to win Internet arguments, it
does have some grounding in reality, as over-estimations of competence are
surprisingly common in all fields of knowledge.
Labels:
psychology,
reasoning,
theories
Insights Good and Bad
Back in the early 90s one of the most pervasive sources of
misinformation weaved its way into mass media, one that is still widely believed
today despite numerous revisions and an updated scientific consensus.
The source in question is the USDA food pyramid, introduced
in 1992 and the first of its kind to not only separate food into common groups,
but also recommend daily servings of each.
Changing Minds
When it comes to influencing people to pick up a habit or
start a new behaviour, it helps to consider how they think about existing
habits. The best framework for exploring this is Sherif’s Social Judgment Theory.
An important component of this model is the Latitudes of
Acceptance; a theory of how people respond to information that either confirms
or denies long-held beliefs.
Labels:
psychology,
sociology
Me, Myself, and Brands
Around fifteen years ago, the Truman Show hit cinemas; a film
about a guy whose entire life was a reality TV show manufactured by an
executive board and broadcast 24/7.
Since then, in the US and UK alone, psychiatrists have
documented over 40 cases of those suffering from the belief that they are in
fact the centre of such a reality TV show, and that every action they take is
being monitored by hidden cameras that secretly broadcast them to millions
across the globe.
The frequency of such cases was enough to give the condition
a name: the Truman Show delusion. The question
is, why the hell did this happen?
Disprove Yourself
For all the talk on how marketing is as far removed from
science as a discipline can be, marketing and advertising progress and evolve
in much the same way as any field of science. Falsifiability.
I’m coming up to the ‘one year’ mark of being a planner, so
I thought I’d impart as much wisdom as a 22-year-old psych grad can ever hope
to, and talk about being wrong.
Implementation Intentions
One of the best ways to modify behaviour and focus on
hitting goals is to construct an ‘if-then’ plan, which follows this formula:
If situation X arises, then I will do Y.
Marketers use this technique to focus consumers on future behaviours by simply asking if they have been
considered. While this doesn’t necessarily cause the behaviour to occur, it does
nudge the consumer toward it by making the idea of it more salient in their
mind. What is not considered now, may well be considered later, at the optimal time of performance.
Profit and Purpose
Marketers use an odd language when they talk to one another.
Words like ‘positioning’ and ‘values’ and ‘authenticity’ pop up, which, to the
rest of us, are close to meaningless when related to how we perceive brands.
A particularly strong word that marketers throw around is purpose. Supposedly, purpose is a brands reason for existing beyond making money
(ironically structured in such a way as to make more money).
'Purpose' means little to consumers for a number of reasons. One
reason is because the strategies marketers use to create a sense of purpose
are invisible to consumers (as they should be). But mostly, it is because most
brands aren’t bought because of a strong sense of purpose.
Solving Non-Problems
Bad campaigns seem to stem from two kinds of strategy: a.) when
a problem isn’t solved at all, and b.) when a problem is solved despite it
not even being a problem. The ‘Blockbuster Box’ from Pizza Hut is an almost textbook
example of the latter.
It is obviously one huge PR stunt, and though it will gain
attention through sheer ridiculousness alone, the Blockbuster Box is just one
example of the strange gimmicky trend to blend technology and advertising to
“solve” problems that are entirely made up, a trend prevalent enough to be parodied.
Loyalty and Satisfaction
Humans are one of the few species known to be both completely
erratic in some behaviours yet predictably habitual in others. This is why
customer satisfaction is so difficult to measure. We buy some categories
predictably, but we buy others whenever and wherever we feel like it. So how
can we identify patterns?
One of the most widely used metrics of customer satisfaction
that is still kicking today is the Net Promoter
Score (NPS), which claims to measure loyalty by asking a series of survey
questions on the likelihood of recommending a product or service to others. And
apparently, it’s king shit.
Mental Visibility
Getting noticed. It is the single most important strategy in
advertising as all notions of consideration and purchase behaviour follow from
it. So would deliberately being invisible be even a remotely effective idea?
As it turns out, it can be, as this campaign from Don Giulio
Salumeria, an Italian delicatessen in Moscow, demonstrates:
Labels:
sociology
The Psychology of Emotion
Emotion is one of the most powerful tools a marketer can
wield, and it is well known that the environment we find ourselves in can spark
an unlimited number of emotional responses that influences how we behave in
future.
But why? Are emotions rational or irrational? Do they have a
strong biological basis? And why do we cluster emotions and behaviours together
to explain the culture surrounding us?
Labels:
psychology,
sociology
Limits of Neuromarketing
Empirical evidence is a good thing, and when looking at how
people respond to advertising, it’s something that the marketing discipline
will always benefit from. However, there is a fine line between evidence that
is applicable to marketing and evidence that is not.
Among more recent trends is neuromarketing, the idea that
brain mapping in real time can determine how consumers behave in response to a
brand, product, or campaign. While promising, this field of research is still
in its early stages, and should be approached critically.
Pervasive Assumptions
A while ago I wrote up a short advertising effectiveness test of
sorts to annoy my friends with. I wanted to see how widespread the
misconceptions surrounding advertising really were. Below are the eight
true/false statements I used:
- Brand loyalty is crucial to achieving high sales
- Demographic segmentation is the best way to reach a target audience
- Advertising works through persuasion
- Brands should primarily seek differentiation from their competitors
- Brand awareness drives sales
- The best way to increase market share is by getting existing buyers to buy more often
- Social media strategy must be differentiated from traditional media strategy
- Mass marketing is an outdated strategy
Knowing Your Sources
Market research, like all social science research, falls
into one of two categories: quantitative and qualitative. Quant data can be categorised and statistically measured,
whereas qual data is non-objective, and cannot
be categorised systematically (e.g. numerically).
The difference is pretty stark, but market research is
particularly susceptible to pulling quant statistics out of the ass of qual
data. This kind of research, unsurprisingly, tells us nothing, and I have found
the perfect example to demonstrate why.
Don't Make Things Harder
Trawling through my Twitter feed today I found an
environmental intervention by McDonalds aiming to nudge people into disposing
of litter more thoughtfully.
At least I think that’s what it’s aiming to achieve. Honestly
I have no idea. Judge for yourself: the McDonald’s Bag Tray.
Signalling Virtue
This week has been marred by controversy surrounding a
campaign by Protein World, in which posters of a thin, fit woman with the
tagline: “Are You Beach Body Ready?” were used
to advertise weight loss formula in London.
Unsurprisingly, the posters received backlash from those who
believed they glorified an unhealthy perception of what a ‘beach body’ should
look like. However, this perception has been around for decades, so why is this
comparatively tame iteration receiving so much negative attention?
False Causation
What do horoscopes, psychic perceptions, and palm reading
have in common? The Barnum effect, in which we falsely
believe that certain statements are tailored especially for us, but in reality could apply to a general population.
A particularly interesting example of this surrounds lunar
cycles, a myth that exists to this day. The lunar effect, as it’s known, is the belief that certain events occur more
frequently when there is a full moon. Why do we believe this?
Caring Companies
The other day I received an email from coglode.com updating me on a new cognitive bias that
had been added to their ever-growing registrar: the Noble Edge Effect. In short, it describes the tendency to perceive socially
conscientious companies as superior to those that are not.
How fitting then, for the recently slaughtered Fresh in Our Memories ANZAC campaign from Woolworths
to come along and demonstrate that manufacturing social conscientiousness can do
the exact opposite, while crashing
and burning spectacularly.
Labels:
social media
Validation | Social Proof
Everything we do is driven by the need to accomplish goals.
These drivers can be hardwired, internally motivated, or socially derived, but
what they all have in common is that they trigger certain behaviours.
Many theorists argue that certain drivers take precedence
over others. Gad Saad argues in favour of four evolved instincts that drive our need to consume. Maslow’s well-known Hierarchy of Needs demonstrates that certain needs must
be fulfilled before other, ‘higher order’, needs are considered.
Social drivers, too, have been scientifically studied. Social proof is a phenomenon often used by marketers
to drive conformity to a particular behaviour, but can be difficult to
leverage. This is because social proof is a complicated pattern of behaviours
influenced by the need for validation.
Mapping Doings
Last year’s Behavioural Economics guide contains a dandy little behaviour map, grouping similar behaviours
together in on a simple axis. I’ve slightly adapted it to the version
below, in my own scrawl.
This is useful for marketers trying to figure out what the type
of behaviour is they’re looking to change, as it will have some influence on
the direction of strategy. Elaborations within.
How Do People Work?
Psychographics: the alternative to traditional forms of
target marketing based on demographic segmentation, or put simply, the targeting
of what people do rather
than who they are.
Commonalities determine grouping of consumers: shared
affect, shared behaviours, and shared experiences. These are encompassed in
cultural attributes that influence how people respond to the environment around
them. Dive in.
Big Data | Faffery
Quick guys, we need to know ASAP how this target market
behaves. We need to track eye movements and mouse hovering and other arbitrary wank to really know our customers. We need to know our customers
so we can push this brand vision and do some real and proper engagement.
You know what we need? We need some data. And I mean, data. Big fucking fuckloads of data.
What do you mean, “how do we get it”? It’s only data, numbers and shit, yeah? Here, just take these surveys and
throw them at people.
Breaking Bad Behaviours
“Insanity: Doing the
same thing over and over again and expecting different results.”
Humans are strange. We’re creatures of habit. We do things because
they are familiar, comfortable, rewarding, and automatic even if they are harmful to our wellbeing.
It’s a tricky thing to detach from. Familiarity breeds liking, and liking creates biases
against anything falling outside of that category. So how to break habits that
are detrimental? Science is here to save everything.
The Psychology of Remembering
Somewhere amongst all the bollocks of brand values and
personality and ‘vision’ a lonely planner did raise a hand, suggesting a
revolutionary concept of brand recall not based on target market analysis.
Except this concept has always been around. Only problem is
it goes against the traditional marketing foray, and therefore tends to be
ignored. It's the process that determines what information we
recall, and it looks a little something like this.
Trendy Activism
Two words that probably shouldn't go together but
unfortunately do.
Whether we do it by liking, sharing, reposting, reblogging,
retweeting, regoogling, or reclickbaitifying, we all love rallying behind a
worthy cause, especially when we can reap those extra-validating Internet
point rewards.
Social Currency: the Warm 'n Fuzzies
People don’t want to talk to brands. They don’t want to hear
about your stories, your personality, or how you plan to ‘engage’ with
customers.
That being said, when it comes to social media, people still
tend to share branded content. Why? Strap on your empathy helmets chaps, let's investigate.
Labels:
social media,
theories
Agency Buzzwords
Let’s kick things off with a bang. Below are four marketing
buzzwords often praised by professional admen, or as I like to call them:
Bullshit Extrapolators.
These words communicate nothing and still continue to float
around agencies, but thankfully each are replaceable by modern, empirically
tested alternatives. Oh how I love a good science high. Lemme puff that beaker,
bro.