Monday marked the release of Snap Inc.’s much-hyped
Spectacles to the masses. Far from a traditional distribution channel, this was
carried out through Snapbots: glorified vending machines that spit out up to
two pairs at a time for hungry trendsetters wishing to jump on the bandwagon.
Snap Inc. have taken advantage of three
major principles of behavioural economics (BE) in order to ride the hype
train all the way to the station.
Five Psychological Traps
This article was originally written as a guest post for Mental Reshape.
When author David Foster
Wallace made a commencement speech at Kenyon College in 2005, he talked about
the dangers of operating on what he termed: “our natural default setting”.
Wallace argued that through conscious choice, people have the power to interpret and respond to the frustrating, mundane realities of everyday life in a manner that is healthy and satisfying. The title of the speech: This is Water, refers to an allegory about fish not being conscious that the water around them is, actually, water.
Wallace argued that through conscious choice, people have the power to interpret and respond to the frustrating, mundane realities of everyday life in a manner that is healthy and satisfying. The title of the speech: This is Water, refers to an allegory about fish not being conscious that the water around them is, actually, water.
By ‘natural default
setting’, Wallace is referring to the unconscious: evolution’s way of filtering the huge amount of sensory information we are
exposed to each and every day. But the unconscious has its drawbacks. Decades
of psychological research have uncovered from it a number of cognitive biases
that affect the way we think and behave.
We’re going to look at
five of these biases. All five occur when we operate on our natural default
setting, and all can be protected against when we consciously choose how to
respond to our environment. Through in-depth examination we can learn to break
free from harmful behavioural patterns, taking control of our life and, ultimately,
our happiness.
Anattā
What superpower best represents you? What’s your Greek God
name? Which character from Game of Thrones are you? What can your star sign
predict about your relationships? What are your core personality traits? Who is
your ideal lover? Who are you? Who are you?
The Intolerance of Understanding
Let’s say that at some point in the next week, we discovered
how to travel back in time. Let’s say we bring our smartphones with us to show
the old world.
How would we explain them?
Labels:
philosophy,
reasoning,
theories
Protecting Ourselves from Sense
Asheley
Landrum recently wrote an article about the bullshit of bullshit. In it, she
critiques studies about bullshit as being bullshit themselves, because of the authors’
predisposition toward information that supports said bullshit effect.
Just Chill Out, Man
There is an idea in digital strategy that those who are
prepared to ‘like’ or ‘follow’ brands on social media are just as enthusiastic
to talk to them; to have a two-way conversation – as it is commonly described –
wherein consumers are ready and willing to listen and respond to what brands
are saying.
Comforting as this idea is for businesses that build
themselves around social media marketing, it’s a huge stretch.
12 Reasons Why You Share Too Much
It’s 7:30am.
You’re sitting down at
your table with a cup of instant and half a pomegranate thumbing your way down
your Facebook feed trying to coax yourself into a semi-wakened state. You
glimpse an article with the words ‘Trump’, ‘evolution’ and ‘Mexicans’ in the
headline and before your brain has caught up you find yourself in a
comments-war with racists and climate change-deniers.